Modeling High-Temperature Superconductivity: Correspondence at Bay?
How does a predecessor theory relate to its successor? According to Heinz Post's General Correspondence Principle, the successor theory has to account for the empirical success of its predecessor. After a critical discussion of this principle, I outline and discuss various kinds of correspondence relations that hold between successive scientific theories. I then look in some detail at a case study from contemporary physics: the various proposals for a theory of high-temperature superconductivity. The aim of this case study is to understand better the prospects and the place of a methodological principle such as the Generalized Correspondence Principle. Generalizing from the case study, I will then argue that some such principle has to be considered, at best, as one tool that might guide scientists in their theorizing. Finally I present a tentative account of why principles such as the Generalized Correspondence Principle work so often and why there is so much continuity in scientific theorizing.Article
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information | Citation: In L. Soler, H. Sankey and P. Hoyningen-Huene (eds.), "Rethinking Scientific Change. Stabilities, Rupture, Incommensurabilities?" (2008), 107-128. |
Keywords | Incommensurability, Change |
Subjects | Philosophy |
Divisions | Institute of Philosophy |
Date Deposited | 08 Oct 2010 10:57 |
Last Modified | 05 Aug 2024 11:50 |
-
picture_as_pdf - S_Hartmann_Superconductivity.pdf