Queen Elizabeth II should be the final Head of the Commonwealth
Lurking not far beneath the surface of the current celebrations of the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee is a nagging
anxiety: what happens next? Nowhere is this more acute than in Commonwealth circles. The future of the headship
of the Commonwealth, a role the Queen has played with such dedication, is in doubt. Should it pass to her heir,
Prince Charles? Dig a little deeper and you soon encounter off-the-record expressions of doubt about Charles’s
suitability. Amid the rather awkward and embarrassed murmurings that pass for debate on this issue, the cases for
and against Charles inheriting the headship have barely been explored or discussed. Set out systematically, both
sets of arguments are powerful and both deserve to be taken seriously. Ultimately, however, we conclude that the
interests of the Commonwealth would be best served if the post of Head of the Commonwealth ceased to exist at
the end of Her Majesty’s reign.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Subjects |
History Politics |
Divisions | Institute of Commonwealth Studies |
Date Deposited | 05 Aug 2013 09:00 |
Last Modified | 06 Aug 2024 00:00 |
-
picture_as_pdf - Opinion_piece_07_12.pdf
-
subject - Published Version